As Thanksgiving holiday approaches, Americans across the continent are preparing for quaint family gatherings, mountains of extra calories, and thousands of miles of long-distance travel. If the events of the past year are any indication, they should also prepare for the cold, unforgiving blue-latex hands of Transportation Security Administration agents.
According to the Air Transport Association, close to 23.2 million passengers will be boarding flights and feeling the frisk during Thanksgiving weekend, a bit less than traveled this same time last year. This is due in part to the well-documented “Opt-Out” day held last year, encouraging scores of travelers to opt-out of the new full body scanner machines in order to air their general dissatisfaction with the new procedure. This event drew great public and media interest but was not as great a success as had been hoped, mostly due to the TSA’s agency-wide decision to turn off the majority of the scanners across the country. Despite the outrage of the American public, the TSA and Homeland Security Department were determined to convince the broader populace of the inherent “benefits” such a policy would bring. Writing in USA Today, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano justified seeking the American people’s “cooperation, patience and a commitment” so as to defeat “the face of a determined enemy”, even going so far as to praise the “safety, efficiency, and commitment to privacy” that such full body scanners would employ.
Reacting to the introduction of the searches, grassroots campaigns were mounted, politicians weighed in, and public outrage sparked a national conversation on the state of security and privacy in the airports. A plethora of offended Americans began turning to Youtube and social media to document the latest instances of airport screening they considered abusive and unnecessary, such as the video of a six-year old girl being patted down which drew millions of viewers from across the world. This prompted then Republican congressman and now current Presidential Candidate Ron Paul to remark: “Government being so bold as to maul us in public and say they’re doing it for our interests. If we tolerate this, there’s something wrong with us”.
It is fitting to note, however, that not all amongst us are willing to take it without protest. Reacting to the judge’s decision to throw out his lawsuit against the TSA, former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura vented his frustrations on the state of freedom in his country. In a press conference before the Federal courthouse in St. Paul, he vowed never to stand for another pledge of allegiance in the “Fascist States of America” again, and is considering seeking Mexican citizenship. At one point, he even threw out the idea of running for President, so as to “defeat these two parties that are destroying our country. Maybe that’s what it takes… When are we going to stop allowing the Government to violate our Constitution and the Bill of Rights?”.
As the turkey and cranberry sauce are distributed this holiday season, and President Obama makes his case for broad acceptance of his expansive foreign policy and furtherance of Bush-era executive powers, invasions of privacy at the nation’s airports are issues bound to be rehashed once more. Notwithstanding the eradication of most of the so-called “terrorists” by unmanned aerial vehicles and night raids in Pakistan, Yemen, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Afghanistan, and Kenya, the government will continue to make the case that even more liberties must be given up in order to secure privacy. This is underscored by leagues of American politicians and thinktanks alike who continue to push for increased security and vigilance against an unseen enemy, while at the same time expanding wars and occupations abroad which fuel them.
While those are all other issues to be discussed at length, the reigning concern is the criminialization of traveling anywhere in the United States. The past year has seen the introduction of the TSA on highways and bus stations, and its reach could even be expanded to shopping malls and sidewalks. This agency, now a $9 billion, 62,000 bureaucracy, has grown exponentially beyond where its creators had intentioned, proved by congressman John Mica’s own remarks, himself one of the many congressman to support its creation, to journalists at Human Events:
“The whole program has been hijacked by bureaucrats,” said Rep. John Mica (R. -Fla.), chairman of the House Transportation Committee.
“It mushroomed into an army,” Mica said. “It’s gone from a couple-billion-dollar enterprise to close to $9 billion.”
As for keeping the American public safe, Mica says, “They’ve failed to actually detect any threat in 10 years.”
“Everything they have done has been reactive. They take shoes off because of [shoe-bomber] Richard Reid, passengers are patted down because of the diaper bomber, and you can’t pack liquids because the British uncovered a plot using liquids,” Mica said.
“It’s an agency that is always one step out of step,” Mica said.
It cost $1 billion just to train workers, which now number more than 62,000, and “they actually trained more workers than they have on the job,” Mica said.
“The whole thing is a complete fiasco,” Mica said.
Whereas previously flying was seen as a luxury for constant travelers, it is now seen as an inevitable hassle for thousands of people, due to arbitrary limits on liquids, bag weights, fingernail clippers, and shampoos, as well as forced X-rays by machines which are constantly re-determined to be unsafe by medical authorities.
This holiday season, do yourself and your country a favor. Do not support the out-of-control airport security theatre agency known as the TSA. Opt-out of invasive body-scanner machines. Do it for privacy, health, and moral reasons. A nation’s government is mainly reflected by the will of the people. Never should one be forced to lose one ounce of liberty for the sake of security. Herein lies your mantra during this Thanksgiving season.
According to the Montreal Gazette this morning, the federal government has just approved the use of “behavior-detection” agents at airports across Canada.
Once the program is fully implemented, specially trained officers with the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority will be able to roam airports on the lookout for unusual or suspicious behaviour by passengers.
What this basically entails, as we covered on the last Liberty In Exile show, is that agents are now being trained to detect “terrorist intent” in people’s faces and micro-expressions. An ABC news report covered the same just a few weeks ago, a program which has already been in use in the United States for quite some time.
Instead of tangible proof linking one to terrorism, emphasis is placed upon one’s actions or behavior while they are at the airport.
In passenger-behaviour observation, officers are trained to detect irregular or suspicious behaviour.
“The emphasis is behaviour-based, for example — wearing heavy clothes on a hot day or paying unusual attention to the screening process,” according to a government background document.
“Screening officers trained in passenger behaviour observation screening may check a passenger’s documents and ask simple questions about the passenger’s identity and reasons for travelling to alleviate any security concerns.”
The program focuses on behaviour, not racial or ethnic profiles, the government is quick to point out.
This represents just another example of paranoid government action which will undoubtedly take more liberties away than it could ever save. Shall we continue to sacrifice our privacy for security which has not yet been proven to work in the slightest?
How is the detection of irritable or misplaced people at the airport, which must be practically everyone, at all reasonable or legitimate as a security measure? The majority of individuals at the airport are uncomfortable because of crowded public space, mediocre bathrooms, extended layovers, overpriced trail-mix, crying babies, bad coffee, unwashed benches, and countless other things. What is considered to be reasonable behavior or expressions after one has been traveling all day in a confined cabin, or is set to share 3 square feet of space with 50 complete strangers?
The truth doth be that this measure is not about security; it is about theatre. Beautiful, elegant, majestic theatre. A performance used to qualm the fears of the irrational populace who have been frightened and primed by their “virtuous” public officials who claim there is always danger on the horizon.
Waiting in the wings of this performance, however, is a billion-dollar industry. Millions of contracts for “security” experts and electronic devices which are guaranteed to MAKE YOU SAFE.
X-ray scanner machines, powder detection wands, 360 degree cameras with thermal imaging, bomb-sniffing dogs with a penchant for squeaky toys, and now: the behavior detection software. Yes, you heard it correctly. Individuals who have safely completed the four hour online training session in the windowless bastion of a basement-level government office are prepared to watch your face for clues. Is that a sniffle you just produced? A wink at a member of the opposite sex? Or is that a secret terrorist code, an idiosyncratic motion which will surely cause the destruction of millions of lives at one fell swoop?
The conscious public should be skeptical, not just in this particular case, but whenever a government agency is tasked with and promises to keep you safe. The measures put in place in the last ten years have done nothing but reassure a zombie population they will continue to be zombies, that billions of government money taken from the citizens will be used to defeat an enemy and protect you from an evil which they have themselves created by their actions and policies across the world.
Machines, gadgets, gizmos, suspicion, paranoia, and spying will never attack the problem at its root. It begins with the occupation of foreign land abroad, and ends with the promise to disintegrate the empire and return humbly to the front-line of the mainland. When war, occupation, and empire is forsaken for peace, trade, and partnerships, only then will these spurious threats be eliminated from memory. Only then will the grievances of our fellow man be thrown by the wayside and fraternity, harmony, and concord embraced above all else.
The enemy is not a fury-browed, tight-lipped imposter who travels with an Dooney & Burke accessory bag and aviators, but it is the policy of the governments which we have continued to give legitimacy to, despite their ultimate transgressions.
As liberal democratic countries continue to dilute the liberties and freedoms once enjoyed by their citizens for the sake of feel-good security measures, there must be voices of reason which guide us to a more just and more righteous existence in the polis. Liberty In Exile will continue to stand as a tool and mouthpiece for those liberties and freedoms we, as a people, once knew. To make government more the servant, and not the master of us all. In these free nations, we do not choose to be ruled, we elect to be governed.
More analysis and commentary will be covered this week on Liberty In Exile, broadcasting from Vienna, Austria.
This video does a great job of explaining what is happening in the airports, both with the porno-trons and the sexual gropes by government agents:
More analysis will be provided on Liberty In Exile, this Friday at 10am on CJLO 1690AM in Montréal, Québec, Canada.